David Rismann Consultants
HomeSoftwareForensicsData RecoveryConsultantsContact Us
spacer.gifspacer.gif
Why Forensics
• For Attorneys
• For Executives
• WSJ Article: "Computer Sleuths"

Why DRC?
• Certifications
• Forensic Procedures
• Document Production
• Project History

Forensics Projects

2008    2007    2006    2005    2004    2003    2002    2001    2000

Wrongful Termination - December 2004
Mia Farber, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman - (213) 689-0404

Objective:
Examination of computer and email in order to assist with the defense of a firm accused of the wrongful termination of an employee.

Disposition: Concluded.

Software Comparison - October 2004
David Haberbush - Haberbush Feinberg, LLP - (562) 435-6335

Objective:
Compare form and function of two check-processing software systems to determine if one is derivative of the other.

Disposition: Concluded.

Improper Use of Proprietary Data - September 2004
Patrick Toole, Sagasar Franson & Jones - (559) 233-4800

Objective:
Former employee is accused of possession and misuse of proprietary company data subsequent to his dismissal. Several computers need to be forensically imaged and analyzed.

Disposition: Settled.

Computer Data Issue - September 2004
David Hoiles, Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman - (213) 689-0404

Objective:
Obtain forensic images of several computers to preserve evidence and analyze contents for relevant data.

Disposition: Concluded.

Debt Prorating Case - June 2004
Joshua W. Glotzer, Attorney at Law - (310) 623-3771

Objective:
Client is involved in a criminal charge related to improper debt prorating. Several computers were seized by law enforcement several years ago and we have been asked to examine the evidence, acquire forensic images of all media, and examine the data.

Testimony: Testified in District Court, November 23, 2004, Riverside, CA.

Disposition: Concluded.

Medical Malpractice - April 2004
Brad Stuckey, Hughes & Clough - (925) 426-9200

Objective:
The contents of a computer used to transcribe dictated notes from a doctor need to be forensically imaged and analyzed.

Disposition: Concluded.

Insurance Claim - April 2004
Katy A. Nelson, Esq., Barbanel & Treuer  - (310) 262-8088

Objective:
Computer containing financial data and documents relevant to this issue needs to be forensically imaged and examined, and any relevant documents produced.

Disposition: Concluded.

Forensic Document Production Consulting - April 2004
Jeffrey C. Bachmann, Compex Legal Services, Inc. - (310) 782-1801

Objective:
We have been asked to provide ongoing consulting and advice to a client wishing to expand his business into the area of forensic data acquisition and document production. Tasks include evaluating specific companies for acquisition, examining available software, discussing plans to develop a custom solution.

Disposition: Concluded.
Falsification of Government Documents - March 2004
Edward M. Robinson, Attorney at Law - (310) 316-9333

Objective:
Federal criminal case. We were asked to review computer data seized by the FBI in conjunction with a parole violation involving web sites that provided counterfeit identification documents.

Disposition: Concluded.
Computer Intrusion - March 2004
Edward M. Robinson, Attorney at Law - (310) 316-9333

Objective:
Federal criminal case. Assisted in the defense of an individual accused of illegally accessing a former employer's email system and destroying data.

Testimony: Testified in Federal Court, June 10, 2004, Los Angeles, CA.

Disposition: The case is being appealed.
Computer Evidence Analysis - January 2004
Myra Sun, Federal Public Defender - (213) 894-2854

Objective:
We were hired to examine the contents of seized computer data in order to determine what material was present, how and when it was acquired.

Disposition: Concluded.


spacer.gif     
spacer.gifspacer.gif
© Copyright 1998-2008 David Rismann Consultants, Inc. All Rights Reserved.